Post Quantum Resistance with Multi-dimensional Result Factoring

Is Your Data Protection Holding You Back?

In today’s landscape, Optionality is the new standard for data security. Once you choose a protection strategy, it should empower—not limit—your ability to use your data. It should never require stripping away safeguards just to make your data usable.

Legacy systems fail this test. They restrict how and when data can be used, and still leave gaps that attackers exploit—proof lies in the constant stream of data breaches making headlines.

But what if your security and privacy tools did the opposite? What if they unlocked new ways to leverage sensitive data across more teams, for more use cases, without ever putting it at risk?

Forward-thinking organizations in finance, healthcare, telecom, and government aren’t settling for outdated tech. They’re investing in solutions designed for the challenges of this decade—not the last.

Explore how Layered Security delivers the flexibility modern data demands.

Chances are, you’ve never heard of Multi-dimensional Result Factoring (MRF). That’s because it’s brand-new technology in data protection. Until it was invented by Anonomatic, every form of data protection —including all legacy technologies such as encryption—was Single-dimensional Result Factoring (SRF).

The fundamental difference between SRF and MRF is that, with SRF-protected data, an attacker is immediately informed whether their attempt has succeeded or failed. Consider any effort to access encrypted data: if the correct cipher and key are used, the data is mathematically transformed and becomes fully readable. But if any variable is incorrect, the attempt fails and the data remains encrypted. When this happens—say, you’re trying to open an encrypted spreadsheet—you might check your caps lock and try again. However, when an attacker is attempting to harvest large volumes of data using massively powerful systems, this immediate feedback on failure tells them to keep going.

With MRF-protected data, an attacker is provided with no indication that their attack succeeded for failed. Attempts to read MRF-protected data will always return results. Is the correct value 2,453 or 4,512 or even ‘giraffe’? It is up to the requestor to know if the results they received are correct and the only way they will know that is knowing that they provided the right keys. As you can imagine, that makes their job exponentially harder and other organizations which are using SRF protection, much easier targets.

How does MRF help protect against the threat of quantum computers? In short, MRF is not based on cryptography. “Very hard math”—and quantum computers’ ability to solve it—simply doesn’t come into play. For more details, see our white paper.

If one of your biggest concerns is susceptibility to Coinbase-type breaches—where compromised credentials allowed attackers to harvest all your data assets (and it should be)—MRF can protect you from that as well.

Finally, MRF is available today and runs on standard hardware. Deploy it on-premises, in your VPC, or anywhere you run containers—only from Anonomatic.

Sound interesting? Please email sales@anonomatic.com for a copy of our ground-breaking white paper.

WRITTEN BY

WRITTEN BY

Matthew Fleck, Founder & CEO - Anonomatic